|
Strengths: Excellent price/performance ratio after latest price cuts
G0 stepping for lower temp & higher overclock
Quad cpu cores for "future proofing"
Weaknesses: Higher wattage consumption than dual core
Majority of apps still do not support multi-core
Lower default cpu clock than newest intel CPUs
Summary: The Q6x00 processors are beginning to show their age, which isn't bad as the prices have come down to dirt cheap levels. The Q6700 runs at a stock speed of 2.66GHz in contrast to the latest processors that run over 3GHz stock and have 1333MHz FSB support. However, the latest batch of Q6700 have very good overclocking potential, allowing performance to easily exceed current cpu stock speeds. My processor is currently running at 3.4GHz and runs WinXP rock solid and passes several hours of torture testing with MemTest and StressPrime. For those who have older systems (e.g. 975X chipset, etc) that don't support the latest Intel processors, the Q6700 is the top of the line. Ignore the QX6700 (Extreme) which is still massively overpriced and not likely to outperform Q6700 at all for most users. For others with newer motherboards, it may be worth purchasing a newer dual core cpu instead with a higher stock clock speed, as performance of most programs still is primarily dependent on core clock speed rather than number of cores. Other downsides are the higher energy consumption (even at idle) of quad core processors compared to dual core counterparts. Also, anyone purchasing this processor is strongly encouraged to find an aftermarket heatsink/fan. The included unit is actually decent for default settings or slight overclocking. But best results can only be achieved with a better HSF. I am using Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro with MX-2 thermal grease. Best of luck to all...

100% of People (7/7) found this review helpful. Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?
There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.
|